|
Editor’s Note: Dr. Sulentic will in Mexico
City and Baja, California, from Oct. 8-16. He will be checking e-mail
daily and looks forward to talking to the media about this subject.
On Oct. 8 and 9 he can be reached at the Institute of Astronomy,
UNAM, Mexico City, 525/622-3908 or 525/616-1312 as the guest of
Dr. Margarita Rosado. After that, e-mail is the best means of contact.
 |
|
NGC4319 and Markarian 205
|
TUSCALOOSA, Ala. - Dr. Jack Sulentic, a professor of astronomy
at The University of Alabama, says a release from the Hubble Heritage
incorrectly reports that there is no bridge between the famous galaxy-quasar
pair NGC4319-Markarian 205.
Hubble (Space Telescope) Heritage is an organization connected
with the Space Telescope Science Institute, and made its release
on Oct. 3 http://oposite.stsci.edu/pubinfo/
PR/2002/23/index.html.
In 1983, Sulentic reported that both NGC4319 and Markarian 205
were connected, which supported a claim presented in 1972 by astronomer
H.C. Arp at the Max Planck Institut fur Astrophysik, Munich, Germany.
At the time Sulentic said that “during the past 10 years,
many astronomers have argued that Arp’s data had to be either
incorrect or due to something other than a physical connection,
since the redshift-implied distances of both objects are significantly
different.”
Through image enhancement and analysis, Sulentic directly confirmed
Arp’s findings of a luminous connection between the two. His
evidence was based on processing Arp’s Palomar and Kitt Peak
telescope images.
Sulentic performed his study at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory
in Pasadena, Calif., during a 1982 NASA summer faculty fellowship.
At the time two alternate explanations for the connection had been
proposed: a foreground star or background galaxy located between
galaxy NGC4319 and the Markarian 205 quasar giving the appearance
of a connection or, the fuzzy edges of the two objects overlap when
viewed through the telescopes.
Sulentic analyzed the light distribution in the area between the
quasar and the galaxy and showed mathematically that neither theory
was possible.
He stands by his finding. “The release tells us that the
most recent Hubble Space Telescope images of this system do not
show a connection. The papers H. Arp and I wrote have never been
refuted in scientific literature. Did we make a mistake no one told
us about?”
He says that a quick glance at the HST composite image reveals
that the image of the galaxy-quasar pair is presented in a way that
emphasizes the brightest parts of the galaxy and the quasar so that
the impression is given that there is no light between the two objects.
“Our work showed that the connection was of low surface
brightness,” he says. “In order to see it one would
have to “burn out” the bright parts of the image and
emphasize the fainter light levels. Technically speaking, the dynamic
range in the image is so great that one cannot see all light levels
at the same time.”
However, he says the Hubble picture actually does show the luminous
connection on the web image by increasing the contrast at fainter
levels.
“You can see the narrow core in the connection, which HST
is able to detect because of its excellent resolution,” Sulentic
says. “It is seen exactly where we found it in the earlier
studies. Using the HST Heritage web data one can quickly show different
versions of the image where the connection is visible. The pictures
shown here clearly reveal the connection at low surface brightness
levels that should enable readers to form their own judgment. Hubble
Space Telescope has in fact, confirmed the earlier work.”
He says there are two independent questions on this issue. The
first is does a luminous connection exist? And secondly, if a connection
exists, what does it mean? Sulentic says the answer to the first
question is yes.
But that opens the possibility, however remote, that the redshift
of at least one of these objects is not telling us the correct distance
(Quasars, Redshifts and Controversies H. Arp).
“There may be other less controversial interpretations as
well, but even the possibility of the former may be inadmissible
to some astronomers,” he says.
Sulentic teaches in the department
of physics and astronomy in the College
of Arts and Sciences. The College of Arts and Sciences is UA’s
largest division and the largest public liberal arts college in
the state, with approximately 5,000 undergraduate and 1,000 graduate
students. The College has received national recognition for academic
excellence, and A&S students have been selected for many of
the nation’s top academic honors, including 15 Rhodes Scholarships,
13 Goldwater Scholarships, seven Truman Scholarships and 11 memberships
on USA Today’s Academic All-American teams.
|